Virgin-O-Logy Virgin Wars
virgin-o-logy.com formerly known also as virginology.org
|men are the gatekeepers of commitment and women are the gatekeepers of sex|
Translate this page!Share with others :-)
web page is to be viewed in Unicode Character Set UTF-8 if problems
UTF-8 is probably the most commonly used encoding. Unicode for humanity united.
Raunchiness: obscenity - vulgarity - promiscuity
not wanted in China
Two comments on exemplative (but not exemplary) English teacher
who acted as instigator of Chinese social structure disintegration
In my opinion, Virginity is an important asset both for girls and boys. how can a girl or a boy who loses her/ his virginity can enjoy the moments of life after marriage satisfactorily. I think Chinese parents need to take serious steps about acquainting their children regarding the preservation of their virginities. However, still in this age we can see that in many Muslim countries you can find millions of young people who have not even touched the opposite sex all through their lifes and the marriage night is the first night when they touch thier life partners for the first time in their life and that is the true pleasure.. i am sorry if my words hurt anybody. I don't mean to hurt u . I only want to request the youth of China to think over and preserve their virginity for the right time !
February 06, 2011
It is very scary that the above English teachers from the West are trying to spread "sexual liberation" in a nation that still values virginity at marriage. Such teachers threaten the ways of Chinese society and ought not be suffered. The USA and the UK have become filthy with STDs, obesity, divorce, rebellion, individualism, feminism, homosexuality. Some (not all!) from those regions are working secretly in China toward the Westernizing of the East, so that the whole world is filled with very dangerous things that destroy traditions, families, and societies. I have faith in the Chinese Government, that it will stop such sex-addicted individualists from ruining the purity of their nation.
November 25, 2011
Empathy: Baseline Position for Humanity
Dr Frans de Waal
at the annual meeting of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science,
"Research has disproved the view, dominant since the 19th century, typical of biologist Thomas Henry Huxley's argument that morality is absent in nature and something created by humans (...) Human morality is unthinkable without empathy (...) Empathy is much more easily generated between individuals who know each other, or who are close to each other, than individuals who are more distant. (...) this "in-group bias [has made it more difficult to] stretch empathy and solidarity. We now live in a world where all sorts of groups mingle in a society...so it's something that should be tried, but it's a challenge."
Empathy: Baseline Position for Roman Catholicism and Islam
The Culture of Death denies empathy, shows no mercy to the weakest ones :